Triple
T23082013
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Wheatland County |
E575499
|
entity |
| Predicate | borderedBy |
P224
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Vulcan County |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Vulcan County | Statement: [Wheatland County, borderedBy, Vulcan County]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Vulcan County Context triple: [Wheatland County, borderedBy, Vulcan County]
-
A.
Vulcan County
chosen
Vulcan County is a rural municipal district in southern Alberta, Canada, known for its agricultural economy and the Star Trek–themed town of Vulcan.
-
B.
Saddle Hills County
Saddle Hills County is a rural municipal district in northwestern Alberta, Canada, known for its agricultural lands, forested areas, and proximity to the Peace River region.
-
C.
Carson County
Carson County is a rural county in the Texas Panhandle known for its agricultural economy and small-town communities.
-
D.
Treasure County
Treasure County is a sparsely populated rural county in south-central Montana known for its agricultural landscape along the Yellowstone River.
-
E.
Gem County
Gem County is a county in southwestern Idaho that forms part of the Boise metropolitan area.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e245be28d48190ad1348d5a73db37d |
completed | April 17, 2026, 2:37 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f18da239e48190ad041261c6b510a0 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 4:48 a.m. |
Created at: April 17, 2026, 3:56 p.m.