Triple
T23071609
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | historic center of Myślenice |
E575210
|
entity |
| Predicate | partOf |
P40
|
FINISHED |
| Object | city of Myślenice |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: city of Myślenice | Statement: [historic center of Myślenice, partOf, city of Myślenice]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: city of Myślenice Context triple: [historic center of Myślenice, partOf, city of Myślenice]
-
A.
Myślenice
chosen
Myślenice is a historic town in southern Poland known for its picturesque setting near the Carpathian foothills and its role as a local cultural and tourist center.
-
B.
Milicz
Milicz is a town in southwestern Poland’s Lower Silesian Voivodeship, known for its surrounding fishponds and natural reserves in the Barycz Valley.
-
C.
Mielec
Mielec is a town in southeastern Poland known for its aviation industry and manufacturing sector.
-
D.
Zamość
Zamość is a Renaissance-planned city in southeastern Poland, renowned for its well-preserved Old Town and UNESCO World Heritage status.
-
E.
Kozienice
Kozienice is a town in east-central Poland known for its large coal-fired power plant and proximity to the Kozienice Landscape Park.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e245bd6e4c8190bb8942245b68cad5 |
completed | April 17, 2026, 2:37 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f18c5ffad881909ed626045c15dd33 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 4:43 a.m. |
Created at: April 17, 2026, 3:56 p.m.