Triple
T23061010
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Jaku Iban |
E574300
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Iban language |
C47193
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: Iban language Context triple: [Jaku Iban, instanceOf, Iban language]
-
A.
Batanic language
The Batanic language is a subgroup of Austronesian languages spoken primarily in the Batanes Islands of the northern Philippines and nearby areas, characterized by shared phonological and lexical features distinct from neighboring Philippine languages.
-
B.
Sama–Bajaw language
The Sama–Bajaw language is a group of closely related Austronesian languages spoken by the seafaring Sama-Bajau peoples across maritime Southeast Asia, particularly in the Philippines, Malaysia, and Indonesia.
-
C.
Nobiin language
Nobiin language is a Northern Nubian language of the Nilo-Saharan family spoken primarily along the Nile in southern Egypt and northern Sudan, notable for its rich oral tradition and historical significance in Nubian culture.
-
D.
Misumalpan language
Misumalpan language is a small family of indigenous languages spoken primarily along the Atlantic coast of Nicaragua and neighboring regions, including Miskito, Sumo (Mayangna), and Matagalpan varieties.
-
E.
Ubangian language
A Ubangian language is a member of a proposed group of Central African languages, primarily spoken in the Central African Republic and neighboring countries, that share common phonological and grammatical features and are often considered a branch of the Niger-Congo family.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e245ba7ae48190be606dbc54120e39 |
completed | April 17, 2026, 2:37 p.m. |
Created at: April 17, 2026, 3:55 p.m.