Triple

T23056156
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Act on the Establishment and Operation of the Patent Court E574160 entity
Predicate relatedTo P37 FINISHED
Object Korean Utility Model Act — NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (3 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Korean Utility Model Act | Statement: [Act on the Establishment and Operation of the Patent Court, relatedTo, Korean Utility Model Act]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Korean Utility Model Act
Context triple: [Act on the Establishment and Operation of the Patent Court, relatedTo, Korean Utility Model Act]
  • A. Utility Model Act of Japan
    The Utility Model Act of Japan is a Japanese intellectual property law that provides protection for technical ideas related to the shape or structure of devices, offering a simpler and shorter-term alternative to patent protection.
  • B. Korean Intellectual Property Office
    The Korean Intellectual Property Office is South Korea’s governmental agency responsible for administering patents, trademarks, and other intellectual property rights.
  • C. Patent Act of Japan
    The Patent Act of Japan is the primary Japanese statute governing the granting, protection, and enforcement of patent rights for inventions within Japan.
  • D. Korean Intellectual Property Tribunal
    The Korean Intellectual Property Tribunal is a specialized quasi-judicial body in South Korea that adjudicates disputes and appeals related to intellectual property rights.
  • E. Design Act of Japan
    The Design Act of Japan is a key intellectual property law that governs the protection and registration of industrial designs in Japan.
  • F. None of above. chosen
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2 Entity disambiguation (via description) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Korean Utility Model Act
Target entity description: The Korean Utility Model Act is a key intellectual property law in South Korea that provides protection for technical ideas related to the shape, structure, or combination of products, offering a faster and often more accessible alternative to patents.
  • A. Utility Model Act of Japan
    The Utility Model Act of Japan is a Japanese intellectual property law that provides protection for technical ideas related to the shape or structure of devices, offering a simpler and shorter-term alternative to patent protection.
  • B. Korean Intellectual Property Office
    The Korean Intellectual Property Office is South Korea’s governmental agency responsible for administering patents, trademarks, and other intellectual property rights.
  • C. Patent Act of Japan
    The Patent Act of Japan is the primary Japanese statute governing the granting, protection, and enforcement of patent rights for inventions within Japan.
  • D. Korean Intellectual Property Tribunal
    The Korean Intellectual Property Tribunal is a specialized quasi-judicial body in South Korea that adjudicates disputes and appeals related to intellectual property rights.
  • E. Design Act of Japan
    The Design Act of Japan is a key intellectual property law that governs the protection and registration of industrial designs in Japan.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (2 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e245ba7ae48190be606dbc54120e39 completed April 17, 2026, 2:37 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f1868099708190b23725dc8a305e09 completed April 29, 2026, 4:18 a.m.
Created at: April 17, 2026, 3:55 p.m.