Triple

T23047542
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Cherokee–United States relations E573918 entity
Predicate significantEvent P259 FINISHED
Object Cherokee Nation v. Georgia (1831) — NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Cherokee Nation v. Georgia (1831) | Statement: [Cherokee–United States relations, significantEvent, Cherokee Nation v. Georgia (1831)]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Cherokee Nation v. Georgia (1831)
Context triple: [Cherokee–United States relations, significantEvent, Cherokee Nation v. Georgia (1831)]
  • A. Cherokee Nation v. Georgia chosen
    Cherokee Nation v. Georgia was an 1831 U.S. Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the Cherokee Nation was a "domestic dependent nation" lacking standing to sue as a foreign nation, a ruling that shaped federal Indian law and the context of Indian Removal.
  • B. Chisholm v. Georgia
    Chisholm v. Georgia was a 1793 U.S. Supreme Court case that held a state could be sued in federal court by a citizen of another state, a ruling that led directly to the adoption of the Eleventh Amendment limiting such suits.
  • C. Worcester v. Georgia
    Worcester v. Georgia was an 1832 U.S. Supreme Court case in which the Court held that states had no authority to impose laws on Native American tribal lands, affirming tribal sovereignty in the face of federal Indian Removal policies.
  • D. Fletcher v. Peck
    Fletcher v. Peck was an 1810 U.S. Supreme Court decision that for the first time struck down a state law as unconstitutional, helping define the scope of the Contract Clause and judicial review over state legislation.
  • E. Martin v. Hunter's Lessee
    Martin v. Hunter's Lessee is an 1816 U.S. Supreme Court case that established the Court's authority to review state court decisions on federal law, reinforcing federal judicial supremacy.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (2 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e245b9c11481909d06c872214d21af completed April 17, 2026, 2:37 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f18678e5c48190a96a7b4c9c82f8fe completed April 29, 2026, 4:18 a.m.
Created at: April 17, 2026, 3:54 p.m.