Triple

T23043598
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Sonata No. 3 in C major, Op. 2 E573809 entity
Predicate tonalArchitecture P150766 FINISHED
Object clear LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: clear | Statement: [Sonata No. 3 in C major, Op. 2, tonalArchitecture, clear]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: tonalArchitecture
Context triple: [Sonata No. 3 in C major, Op. 2, tonalArchitecture, clear]
  • A. tonalSystem
    Indicates a relationship where a language or musical system is characterized by a specific set of tonal patterns or pitch distinctions that structure its sounds or expressions.
  • B. tonal
    Indicates that one entity has a tone, pitch pattern, or tonal quality in relation to another (such as a language, sound, or musical element).
  • C. tonalCenter
    Indicates that one musical element functions as the primary pitch or key center around which another musical element is organized.
  • D. tonalAssociation
    Indicates a relationship where one entity is linked to another through a shared or corresponding tonal quality, pitch, or key.
  • E. tonalCharacteristic
    Indicates the specific quality or character of a sound’s tone, such as its color, texture, or expressive nuance, in relation to an entity.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e245b9c11481909d06c872214d21af completed April 17, 2026, 2:37 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f18517083c8190a0850da5440e0a73 completed April 29, 2026, 4:12 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69ef89d5f71881908b9f9d0c8aab278c completed April 27, 2026, 4:07 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69ef9b7494f4819088ae59ea3d0ae8ab completed April 27, 2026, 5:23 p.m.
Created at: April 17, 2026, 3:54 p.m.