Triple
T23038896
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Revenue Act of 1926 |
E573681
|
entity |
| Predicate | reducedTax |
P150753
|
FINISHED |
| Object | individual income tax |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: individual income tax | Statement: [Revenue Act of 1926, reducedTax, individual income tax]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: reducedTax Context triple: [Revenue Act of 1926, reducedTax, individual income tax]
-
A.
reducedDutyRateOn
Indicates a relationship where a reduced customs or tax duty rate is applied to a specified item or transaction.
-
B.
reducedCommissionRate
Indicates that the commission rate applied to a transaction or agreement is lower than the standard or previously agreed rate.
-
C.
reducedTopMarginalRateTo
Indicates that an entity has lowered the highest marginal rate (such as a top tax or interest rate) to a specified new level.
-
D.
reducedTopMarginalRateFrom
Indicates that an entity lowered the highest marginal rate (such as a top tax or interest rate) from a specified prior level.
-
E.
taxOn
Indicates that one entity imposes or applies a tax on another entity or item.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e245b911188190bc3d96326c847969 |
completed | April 17, 2026, 2:37 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f185121da0819095b523d7d2c923ab |
completed | April 29, 2026, 4:12 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69ef89d5f71881908b9f9d0c8aab278c |
completed | April 27, 2026, 4:07 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69ef9b7494f4819088ae59ea3d0ae8ab |
completed | April 27, 2026, 5:23 p.m. |
Created at: April 17, 2026, 3:53 p.m.