Triple
T23036242
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Abram Bergson |
E573601
|
entity |
| Predicate | notableWork |
P4
|
FINISHED |
| Object | "A Reformulation of Certain Aspects of Welfare Economics" |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
Disambiguation candidates (1 decision)
The exact options the model was shown at each disambiguation step, with the option it chose highlighted — the evidence behind this triple's disambiguated ids.
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: "A Reformulation of Certain Aspects of Welfare Economics" Context triple: [Abram Bergson, notableWork, "A Reformulation of Certain Aspects of Welfare Economics"]
-
A.
fundamental theorems of welfare economics
The fundamental theorems of welfare economics are core results in microeconomic theory that formally link competitive market equilibria with Pareto efficiency and the conditions under which any efficient allocation can be supported as a market equilibrium.
-
B.
The Economics of Welfare
The Economics of Welfare is a foundational 1920 economics treatise by Arthur Cecil Pigou that systematically develops welfare economics and the concept of externalities to analyze the role of government in correcting market failures.
-
C.
Bergson–Samuelson social welfare function
chosen
The Bergson–Samuelson social welfare function is a formal tool in welfare economics that aggregates individual utilities into a single measure of social welfare to evaluate and compare economic states or policies.
-
D.
second fundamental theorem of welfare economics
The second fundamental theorem of welfare economics states that, under certain ideal conditions, any Pareto efficient allocation of resources can be achieved as a competitive market equilibrium given an appropriate redistribution of initial endowments.
-
E.
Demand Theory without a Utility Index
Demand Theory without a Utility Index is an influential economic work by Lionel W. McKenzie that develops consumer demand analysis without relying on a cardinal utility function, emphasizing instead observable choice behavior and preference consistency.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
| Stage | Batch ID | Job type | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| creating | batch_69e245b911188190bc3d96326c847969 |
elicitation | completed |
| NER | batch_69f1850fe5348190b42259595d82cff4 |
ner | completed |
Created at: April 17, 2026, 3:53 p.m.