Triple

T23036179
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Pareto improvement E573600 entity
Predicate contrastedWith P278 FINISHED
Object Kaldor–Hicks improvement NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Kaldor–Hicks improvement | Statement: [Pareto improvement, contrastedWith, Kaldor–Hicks improvement]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Kaldor–Hicks improvement
Context triple: [Pareto improvement, contrastedWith, Kaldor–Hicks improvement]
  • A. Pareto improvement
    A Pareto improvement is a change in allocation that makes at least one individual better off without making anyone else worse off.
  • B. Hicks–Kaldor compensation criterion chosen
    The Hicks–Kaldor compensation criterion is an economic efficiency test stating that a policy change is desirable if those who gain could in principle compensate those who lose and still be better off, regardless of whether compensation actually occurs.
  • C. Pareto efficiency
    Pareto efficiency is an economic concept describing an allocation of resources where no individual can be made better off without making someone else worse off.
  • D. second fundamental theorem of welfare economics
    The second fundamental theorem of welfare economics states that, under certain ideal conditions, any Pareto efficient allocation of resources can be achieved as a competitive market equilibrium given an appropriate redistribution of initial endowments.
  • E. Bergson–Samuelson social welfare function
    The Bergson–Samuelson social welfare function is a formal tool in welfare economics that aggregates individual utilities into a single measure of social welfare to evaluate and compare economic states or policies.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (2 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e245b911188190bc3d96326c847969 completed April 17, 2026, 2:37 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f1850fe5348190b42259595d82cff4 completed April 29, 2026, 4:12 a.m.
Created at: April 17, 2026, 3:53 p.m.