Triple

T23033816
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Felipe de Alba E573539 entity
Predicate marriageStatusWithZsaZsaGabor P81807 FINISHED
Object annulled LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: annulled | Statement: [Felipe de Alba, marriageStatusWithZsaZsaGabor, annulled]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: marriageStatusWithZsaZsaGabor
Context triple: [Felipe de Alba, marriageStatusWithZsaZsaGabor, annulled]
  • A. hasCivilStatus
    Indicates the civil or marital status that applies to a person or entity (e.g., single, married, divorced).
  • B. marriageType
    Indicates the specific legal or social category of a marriage relationship that exists between two spouses.
  • C. spouseStatus
    Indicates the marital relationship status between two individuals, such as whether they are currently spouses, formerly spouses, or not married to each other.
  • D. marriageLegalStatus chosen
    Indicates the legal status of a marriage relationship between entities, such as whether it is valid, invalid, pending, or dissolved under applicable law.
  • E. spouseStatusAtMarriage
    Indicates the marital status each partner held at the time their marriage to one another was formed.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e245b911188190bc3d96326c847969 completed April 17, 2026, 2:37 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f18482e78c8190a89681eec2edb812 completed April 29, 2026, 4:09 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69ef3ba004a48190885aece88efd1f52 completed April 27, 2026, 10:34 a.m.
Created at: April 17, 2026, 3:53 p.m.