Triple
T23027920
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Coleman–Mandula theorem |
E573373
|
entity |
| Predicate | typeOfSymmetryRestriction |
P120833
|
FINISHED |
| Object | no-go result for nontrivial bosonic unification of spacetime and internal symmetries |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: no-go result for nontrivial bosonic unification of spacetime and internal symmetries | Statement: [Coleman–Mandula theorem, typeOfSymmetryRestriction, no-go result for nontrivial bosonic unification of spacetime and internal symmetries]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: typeOfSymmetryRestriction Context triple: [Coleman–Mandula theorem, typeOfSymmetryRestriction, no-go result for nontrivial bosonic unification of spacetime and internal symmetries]
-
A.
hasSymmetryType
Indicates that one entity possesses a specific kind or pattern of symmetry characterized or classified by the other entity.
-
B.
symmetryOf
Indicates that one entity is the symmetry counterpart or symmetric form of another entity, typically related by a specific symmetry operation or transformation.
-
C.
usesSymmetryGroup
Indicates that one entity employs or is based on a particular symmetry group in its structure, behavior, or formulation.
-
D.
symmetryInvolved
chosen
Indicates that a relationship or action inherently involves symmetry, such as invariance under certain transformations or the presence of symmetric structure or behavior.
-
E.
hasSymmetryBreaking
Indicates that a system, configuration, or state exhibits symmetry breaking, where an underlying symmetry of the governing rules is not reflected in the realized outcome.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e245b821008190b0e09cb02092aae1 |
completed | April 17, 2026, 2:37 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f1847e48c48190894525c354663dd2 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 4:09 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69ef3ba004a48190885aece88efd1f52 |
completed | April 27, 2026, 10:34 a.m. |
Created at: April 17, 2026, 3:52 p.m.