Triple

T23022169
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Temple of Neith at Sais E573196 entity
Predicate connectedWithConcept P134911 FINISHED
Object warfare (through Neith) LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: warfare (through Neith) | Statement: [Temple of Neith at Sais, connectedWithConcept, warfare (through Neith)]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: connectedWithConcept
Context triple: [Temple of Neith at Sais, connectedWithConcept, warfare (through Neith)]
  • A. relatedToRealWorldConcept
    Indicates that something has a direct connection, correspondence, or relevance to a concept that exists or is recognized in the real world.
  • B. hasConcept
    Indicates that an entity includes, embodies, or is associated with a particular concept.
  • C. hasConceptualInvolvementBy
    Indicates that something is conceptually influenced, shaped, or defined by the ideas, theories, or mental contributions of a particular agent or source.
  • D. associatedIdea chosen
    Indicates that one entity is conceptually linked or related to another as an idea, theme, or notion.
  • E. definitionOfRelatedConcept
    Indicates that one concept provides the formal meaning, explanation, or characterization of another closely related concept.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e245b821008190b0e09cb02092aae1 completed April 17, 2026, 2:37 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f183ea23088190b2f42d9bf01514ac completed April 29, 2026, 4:07 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69ef3ba004a48190885aece88efd1f52 completed April 27, 2026, 10:34 a.m.
Created at: April 17, 2026, 3:52 p.m.