Triple
T23019944
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Griffith Swans |
E573132
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasTeamColours |
P4834
|
FINISHED |
| Object | red and white |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: red and white | Statement: [Griffith Swans, hasTeamColours, red and white]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasTeamColours Context triple: [Griffith Swans, hasTeamColours, red and white]
-
A.
clubColoursReflected
Indicates that the club’s official colours are visibly represented or mirrored in the referenced object or context.
-
B.
hasSchoolColours
Indicates that an entity is associated with one or more official colours that represent it, typically in formal or symbolic contexts.
-
C.
teamColor
chosen
Indicates the association between a team and the color that represents or identifies it.
-
D.
clubColorsDisplayed
Indicates that the colors associated with a club are being visibly shown or presented.
-
E.
teamColorOrIdentity
Indicates that a team is associated with a particular color or identifying attribute used to distinguish it from other teams.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e245b821008190b0e09cb02092aae1 |
completed | April 17, 2026, 2:37 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f183e8324c81908b8868d298af66e1 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 4:07 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69ef3b9cd5488190bcd23183179f48cd |
completed | April 27, 2026, 10:34 a.m. |
Created at: April 17, 2026, 3:52 p.m.