Triple

T23013195
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Formula 3 teams E572960 entity
Predicate targetOutcomeForDrivers P150666 FINISHED
Object progression to Formula 2 LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: progression to Formula 2 | Statement: [Formula 3 teams, targetOutcomeForDrivers, progression to Formula 2]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: targetOutcomeForDrivers
Context triple: [Formula 3 teams, targetOutcomeForDrivers, progression to Formula 2]
  • A. targetOutcomeForClients
    Indicates the specific result or benefit that an action, service, or process is intended to achieve for clients.
  • B. driveResult
    Indicates the outcome or consequence produced by a driving action or driving-related event.
  • C. transportGoal
    Indicates that an entity has the objective or intended outcome of moving or conveying something or someone from one place to another.
  • D. outcomeOf
    Indicates that one entity is the result, consequence, or product that arises from another entity, event, or process.
  • E. possibleDriver
    Indicates that an entity is a candidate or potential driver of another entity, such as a possible cause, regulator, or influencing factor.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e245b764cc8190a51be76f1d9611e1 completed April 17, 2026, 2:37 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f183e300008190bb12c6388a8b3280 completed April 29, 2026, 4:06 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69ef3b9cd5488190bcd23183179f48cd completed April 27, 2026, 10:34 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69ef538b29c081908fa56ee35a1dcee7 completed April 27, 2026, 12:16 p.m.
Created at: April 17, 2026, 3:51 p.m.