Triple

T23003375
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Coën E572692 entity
Predicate hasPronunciationClarificationFunction P88816 FINISHED
Object diaeresis on the letter e LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: diaeresis on the letter e | Statement: [Coën, hasPronunciationClarificationFunction, diaeresis on the letter e]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasPronunciationClarificationFunction
Context triple: [Coën, hasPronunciationClarificationFunction, diaeresis on the letter e]
  • A. hasPronunciationInformation
    Indicates that there is available information describing how something is pronounced.
  • B. hasPronunciationDifferenceFrom
    Indicates that two linguistic items differ in how they are pronounced.
  • C. hasExampleWordPronunciation
    Indicates that an entity is associated with a specific example of how a word is pronounced.
  • D. typeOfPronunciationDescribed
    Indicates that one entity specifies or characterizes the kind or style of pronunciation associated with another entity.
  • E. requiresDescriptionForPronunciation chosen
    Indicates that something needs an explanatory description in order for its pronunciation to be correctly understood or produced.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e245b6a3ac81908087599eefe3e365 completed April 17, 2026, 2:37 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f183549bdc81908fdcd44e2c92f7c4 completed April 29, 2026, 4:04 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69ef3b9cd5488190bcd23183179f48cd completed April 27, 2026, 10:34 a.m.
Created at: April 17, 2026, 3:50 p.m.