Triple
T22997096
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Abell 3571 |
E572529
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasClusterRichness |
P141746
|
FINISHED |
| Object | rich cluster |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: rich cluster | Statement: [Abell 3571, hasClusterRichness, rich cluster]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasClusterRichness Context triple: [Abell 3571, hasClusterRichness, rich cluster]
-
A.
isRichCluster
Indicates that a given cluster possesses the properties and characteristics of a rich cluster (e.g., high galaxy density and mass).
-
B.
hasRichnessClass
chosen
Indicates that an entity is assigned to a particular richness category or level within a defined classification system.
-
C.
hasCluster
Indicates that one entity possesses, contains, or is associated with a specific cluster or grouping of related elements.
-
D.
hostGalaxyClusterRichness
Indicates the number or density of galaxies in the cluster that hosts a given object, reflecting how rich or populous that host galaxy cluster is.
-
E.
hasClusterRadius
Indicates the radius or spatial extent associated with a particular cluster.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e245b6a3ac81908087599eefe3e365 |
completed | April 17, 2026, 2:37 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f182f452b48190951fc5dde56c1bb2 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 4:03 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69ef3b974e7c8190b8be11dbb4518693 |
completed | April 27, 2026, 10:33 a.m. |
Created at: April 17, 2026, 3:50 p.m.