Triple
T22992800
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | String Quartet No. 2 (Elliott Carter) |
E572096
|
entity |
| Predicate | workNumberInQuartets |
P57122
|
FINISHED |
| Object | 2 |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 2 | Statement: [String Quartet No. 2 (Elliott Carter), workNumberInQuartets, 2]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: workNumberInQuartets Context triple: [String Quartet No. 2 (Elliott Carter), workNumberInQuartets, 2]
-
A.
workNumberWithinLateQuartets
Indicates that a work’s identifying number falls within the subset of compositions known as the “late quartets.”
-
B.
numberOfStringQuartets
Indicates the quantity of string quartets associated with a given entity.
-
C.
workNumberWithinPair
Indicates that an entity’s work number is defined relative to, and falls within, a specific paired grouping or association.
-
D.
workNumberInSet
chosen
Indicates that a particular work number belongs to, or is included within, a specified set of work numbers.
-
E.
workNumberInComposerChamberMusic
Indicates that a specific work number is assigned to a composer's piece within their body of chamber music.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e245b535808190adef8a9df3c584db |
completed | April 17, 2026, 2:37 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f182f017a88190b02d0649a3af5d99 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 4:02 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69ef3b974e7c8190b8be11dbb4518693 |
completed | April 27, 2026, 10:33 a.m. |
Created at: April 17, 2026, 3:50 p.m.