Triple
T22985269
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Hedwig of Sagan |
E571588
|
entity |
| Predicate | nobleFamily |
P914
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Piasts of Żagań |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Piasts of Żagań | Statement: [Hedwig of Sagan, nobleFamily, Piasts of Żagań]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Piasts of Żagań Context triple: [Hedwig of Sagan, nobleFamily, Piasts of Żagań]
-
A.
Piasts of Żagań
chosen
The Piasts of Żagań were a Silesian branch of the medieval Polish Piast royal family that ruled the Duchy of Żagań and surrounding territories.
-
B.
Piasts of Brzeg
The Piasts of Brzeg were a Silesian branch of the Polish Piast royal family that ruled the Duchy of Brzeg during the late Middle Ages and early modern period.
-
C.
Piasts of Zator
The Piasts of Zator were a regional branch of the Polish Piast royal family that ruled the small duchy of Zator in medieval Silesia.
-
D.
Piasts of Czersk
The Piasts of Czersk were a regional branch of the medieval Polish Piast royal family that ruled the Czersk area in Masovia.
-
E.
Piasts of Cieszyn
The Piasts of Cieszyn were a Silesian branch of the medieval Polish Piast royal dynasty that ruled the Duchy of Cieszyn and its surrounding territories.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e245b3c50481908bb3741ec9f40862 |
completed | April 17, 2026, 2:37 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f182996ee08190ab74014ee7ecac2b |
completed | April 29, 2026, 4:01 a.m. |
Created at: April 17, 2026, 3:49 p.m.