Triple
T22970357
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Taylor |
E571169
|
entity |
| Predicate | historicallyIndicates |
P150444
|
FINISHED |
| Object | ancestor worked as a tailor |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: ancestor worked as a tailor | Statement: [Taylor, historicallyIndicates, ancestor worked as a tailor]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: historicallyIndicates Context triple: [Taylor, historicallyIndicates, ancestor worked as a tailor]
-
A.
historicallyIn
Indicates that one entity existed, occurred, or was situated within the historical context, period, or jurisdiction associated with another entity.
-
B.
historicallyGivenIn
Indicates that something was customarily or traditionally granted, presented, or assigned to something or someone in the past.
-
C.
historicallyEncompassed
Indicates that one entity previously included, covered, or contained another entity within its scope, extent, or boundaries during a past historical period.
-
D.
historicallyConsidered
Indicates that one entity has been regarded or classified in a particular way relative to another entity during a past historical period.
-
E.
historicallyLinked
Indicates that two entities are connected through a shared or related historical event, period, or development.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e245b2c6548190a0e4c7f2f7df2d48 |
completed | April 17, 2026, 2:37 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f1823272c4819083e4653d231facec |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:59 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69ef3b9101f48190a06c69dff26c6441 |
completed | April 27, 2026, 10:33 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69ef538a115081908982597f79355840 |
completed | April 27, 2026, 12:16 p.m. |
Created at: April 17, 2026, 3:48 p.m.