Triple
T22968890
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Chiwei Yu |
E571123
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasLegalClaimBasis |
P121916
|
FINISHED |
| Object | historical usage (China/Taiwan claim) |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: historical usage (China/Taiwan claim) | Statement: [Chiwei Yu, hasLegalClaimBasis, historical usage (China/Taiwan claim)]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasLegalClaimBasis Context triple: [Chiwei Yu, hasLegalClaimBasis, historical usage (China/Taiwan claim)]
-
A.
hasLegalRight
Indicates that an entity possesses an officially recognized legal entitlement or permission to perform an action or hold a claim regarding another entity.
-
B.
hasLegalIssue
Indicates that an entity is involved in, associated with, or subject to a legal problem, dispute, or proceeding.
-
C.
hasLegalSubject
Indicates that an entity serves as the legal subject (e.g., rights-holder or obligated party) in a legal relationship or context.
-
D.
hasLegalResponse
Indicates that an entity has an associated legal reply, action, or measure taken in response to a legal situation, claim, or requirement.
-
E.
legalStandingBasis
chosen
Indicates the legal grounds or justification on which a party’s standing or authority in a legal matter is based.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e245b2c6548190a0e4c7f2f7df2d48 |
completed | April 17, 2026, 2:37 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f18231459881909dd25a0630c494d8 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:59 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69ef3b9101f48190a06c69dff26c6441 |
completed | April 27, 2026, 10:33 a.m. |
Created at: April 17, 2026, 3:48 p.m.