Triple

T22947034
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject The Island Stallion E569901 entity
Predicate hasFictionalHorse P55479 FINISHED
Object Flame LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Flame | Statement: [The Island Stallion, hasFictionalHorse, Flame]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasFictionalHorse
Context triple: [The Island Stallion, hasFictionalHorse, Flame]
  • A. hasFictionalPet
    Indicates that an entity has, owns, or is associated with a pet that is fictional or imaginary.
  • B. hasRacehorseCharacter
    Indicates that one entity possesses the traits, qualities, or behavioral characteristics associated with a racehorse in relation to another entity or context.
  • C. hasNotableHorse chosen
    Indicates that an entity is associated with a horse that is considered notable or distinguished in some recognized way.
  • D. hasFictionalAgriculturalCharacter
    Indicates that an entity features or includes a character associated with agriculture within a fictional context.
  • E. hasFictionalProperty
    Indicates that an entity possesses a property, attribute, or characteristic that exists only in a fictional or imaginary context.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e2459199d08190a8184ee2aa935842 completed April 17, 2026, 2:37 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f1819e559c81909e63acfc23f9476b completed April 29, 2026, 3:57 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69ef3b882e708190b0eb0c87021c75b8 completed April 27, 2026, 10:33 a.m.
Created at: April 17, 2026, 3:46 p.m.