Triple

T22934275
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Celebic E569535 entity
Predicate hasSubgroup P747 FINISHED
Object Wotu–Wolio languages NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Wotu–Wolio languages | Statement: [Celebic, hasSubgroup, Wotu–Wolio languages]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Wotu–Wolio languages
Context triple: [Celebic, hasSubgroup, Wotu–Wolio languages]
  • A. Wotu–Wolio languages chosen
    The Wotu–Wolio languages are a subgroup of Austronesian languages spoken in Sulawesi, Indonesia, known for their close relationship within the Celebic branch.
  • B. Wati languages
    Wati languages are a subgroup of Australian Aboriginal Pama–Nyungan languages spoken traditionally across parts of central and western Australia.
  • C. Wintuan languages
    Wintuan languages are a small family of Native American languages historically spoken in northern California, often grouped within the proposed Penutian phylum.
  • D. Chimbu–Wahgi languages
    The Chimbu–Wahgi languages are a group of closely related Papuan languages spoken primarily in the highlands of Papua New Guinea.
  • E. Tiwa languages
    The Tiwa languages are a group of closely related Tanoan languages spoken by Tiwa Pueblo peoples in parts of New Mexico and Texas.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (2 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e24590862c8190858f180ad302adab completed April 17, 2026, 2:37 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f18134484c8190b7311606c17d058d completed April 29, 2026, 3:55 a.m.
Created at: April 17, 2026, 3:44 p.m.