Triple

T22933861
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Loinang dialect E569519 entity
Predicate partOf P40 FINISHED
Object Saluan language continuum — NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (3 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Saluan language continuum | Statement: [Loinang dialect, partOf, Saluan language continuum]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Saluan language continuum
Context triple: [Loinang dialect, partOf, Saluan language continuum]
  • A. Mono language continuum
    The Mono language continuum is a group of closely related Native American languages traditionally spoken by the Mono people of central California, encompassing varieties such as Western Mono.
  • B. Luri language continuum
    The Luri language continuum is a group of closely related Southwestern Iranian dialects spoken primarily by Lur and Bakhtiari communities in western and southwestern Iran.
  • C. Potohari language continuum
    The Potohari language continuum is a group of closely related Indo-Aryan dialects spoken primarily in Pakistan’s Potohar Plateau and surrounding regions, forming a transitional zone between Punjabi and Hindko.
  • D. Yabem-Takia language continuum
    The Yabem–Takia language continuum is a group of closely related Austronesian languages spoken in coastal and island areas of northern Papua New Guinea, forming a dialect chain rather than a single uniform language.
  • E. Embera language continuum
    The Embera language continuum is a group of closely related Chocoan languages spoken by the Embera people of Colombia and Panama, characterized by mutual intelligibility and regional dialect variation.
  • F. None of above. chosen
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2 Entity disambiguation (via description) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Saluan language continuum
Target entity description: The Saluan language continuum is a group of closely related Austronesian languages spoken primarily in Central Sulawesi, Indonesia, whose varieties form a gradual chain of mutual intelligibility rather than a single uniform language.
  • A. Mono language continuum
    The Mono language continuum is a group of closely related Native American languages traditionally spoken by the Mono people of central California, encompassing varieties such as Western Mono.
  • B. Luri language continuum
    The Luri language continuum is a group of closely related Southwestern Iranian dialects spoken primarily by Lur and Bakhtiari communities in western and southwestern Iran.
  • C. Potohari language continuum
    The Potohari language continuum is a group of closely related Indo-Aryan dialects spoken primarily in Pakistan’s Potohar Plateau and surrounding regions, forming a transitional zone between Punjabi and Hindko.
  • D. Yabem-Takia language continuum
    The Yabem–Takia language continuum is a group of closely related Austronesian languages spoken in coastal and island areas of northern Papua New Guinea, forming a dialect chain rather than a single uniform language.
  • E. Embera language continuum
    The Embera language continuum is a group of closely related Chocoan languages spoken by the Embera people of Colombia and Panama, characterized by mutual intelligibility and regional dialect variation.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (2 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e24590862c8190858f180ad302adab completed April 17, 2026, 2:37 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f18134484c8190b7311606c17d058d completed April 29, 2026, 3:55 a.m.
Created at: April 17, 2026, 3:44 p.m.