Triple
T22932090
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | ESearch |
E569467
|
entity |
| Predicate | supportsBooleanOperators |
P150301
|
FINISHED |
| Object | true |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [ESearch, supportsBooleanOperators, true]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: supportsBooleanOperators Context triple: [ESearch, supportsBooleanOperators, true]
-
A.
supportsOperationsIn
Indicates that one entity enables, facilitates, or backs the execution of operations within a specified context, area, or domain of another entity.
-
B.
supportsOperationsWith
Indicates that one entity enables, facilitates, or is compatible with the execution of operations involving another entity.
-
C.
supportsPartialMatch
Indicates that the relationship or operation allows matching based on a subset or portion of the target criteria rather than requiring a complete or exact match.
-
D.
supportsUse
Indicates that one entity enables, allows, or is compatible with the use or operation of another entity.
-
E.
alsoSupports
Indicates that an entity, in addition to its primary or previously stated function, provides support for another entity, feature, or activity.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e2458f7d008190901dccbaebeaba24 |
completed | April 17, 2026, 2:37 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f1813260608190bb9e1ca704c7e12f |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:55 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69ef3b882e708190b0eb0c87021c75b8 |
completed | April 27, 2026, 10:33 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69ef538a115081908982597f79355840 |
completed | April 27, 2026, 12:16 p.m. |
Created at: April 17, 2026, 3:44 p.m.