Triple

T22907490
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Porterdale, Georgia E568487 entity
Predicate hasPostalDesignation P974 FINISHED
Object Porterdale, GA NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Porterdale, GA | Statement: [Porterdale, Georgia, hasPostalDesignation, Porterdale, GA]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Porterdale, GA
Context triple: [Porterdale, Georgia, hasPostalDesignation, Porterdale, GA]
  • A. Porterdale, Georgia chosen
    Porterdale, Georgia is a small historic mill town in Newton County known for its early 20th-century textile industry and location along the Yellow River.
  • B. Plainville, Georgia
    Plainville, Georgia is a small rural city located in northwestern Georgia within Gordon County.
  • C. Alapaha, Georgia
    Alapaha, Georgia is a small rural town in Berrien County known for its historic Southern character and proximity to the Alapaha River in south-central Georgia.
  • D. Fair Oaks, Georgia
    Fair Oaks, Georgia is a small unincorporated community and census-designated place in the Atlanta metropolitan area.
  • E. Fairburn, Georgia
    Fairburn, Georgia is a small city in the Atlanta metropolitan area known for its historic downtown and role as a growing suburban community.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (2 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e2458cd9e48190943ad2e34485d939 completed April 17, 2026, 2:37 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f18071b9ec81908922d5f046f7930a completed April 29, 2026, 3:52 a.m.
Created at: April 17, 2026, 3:42 p.m.