Triple
T22888483
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Kikai dialect |
E567669
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | regional dialect of the Amami language |
C46981
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: regional dialect of the Amami language Context triple: [Kikai dialect, instanceOf, regional dialect of the Amami language]
-
A.
Unami dialect
The Unami dialect is a historical variety of the Lenape (Delaware) language traditionally spoken by the Unami division of the Lenape people in parts of what are now Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and Delaware.
-
B.
Oshiwambo dialect
Oshiwambo dialect is a regional linguistic variety of the Oshiwambo language, characterized by distinct phonological, lexical, and grammatical features used by specific communities in northern Namibia and southern Angola.
-
C.
Subanen language variety
A Subanen language variety is a specific regional or social form of the Subanen language spoken by Subanen communities in the Zamboanga Peninsula and surrounding areas of the southern Philippines, characterized by distinct phonological, lexical, and grammatical features.
-
D.
Hokkien dialect
Hokkien dialect is a group of Southern Min Chinese varieties spoken primarily in Taiwan, Fujian, and Southeast Asian Chinese communities, known for its rich tonal system and distinct vocabulary from Mandarin.
-
E.
Yokutsan language variety
A Yokutsan language variety is a specific linguistic form or dialect within the Yokutsan language family traditionally spoken by Indigenous Yokuts peoples of California’s Central Valley.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e2458a92ec81908fc1cd5f6407d2ab |
completed | April 17, 2026, 2:36 p.m. |
Created at: April 17, 2026, 3:40 p.m.