Triple
T22871489
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Praia de Gaibu |
E567206
|
entity |
| Predicate | pertenceA |
P109922
|
FINISHED |
| Object | município de Cabo de Santo Agostinho |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: município de Cabo de Santo Agostinho | Statement: [Praia de Gaibu, pertenceA, município de Cabo de Santo Agostinho]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: pertenceA Context triple: [Praia de Gaibu, pertenceA, município de Cabo de Santo Agostinho]
-
A.
appartientÀ
chosen
Indicates that one entity belongs to, is a member of, or is part of another entity.
-
B.
hasPartIn
Indicates that an entity participates in or plays a role within a larger event, process, or composite entity.
-
C.
canBelongTo
Indicates that something is capable of being a member or part of a particular group, category, or owner.
-
D.
believedToBelongTo
Indicates that something is thought or assumed, but not definitively known, to be owned by or part of a particular entity.
-
E.
membershipIn
Indicates that an entity belongs to, is part of, or holds membership in a particular group, organization, or collection.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e24589d8348190b96422d13a678bc1 |
completed | April 17, 2026, 2:36 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f17f05c688819097ba3d24ea8e52f5 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:46 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69eed2d8c0608190afef4c4e530c0e2c |
completed | April 27, 2026, 3:07 a.m. |
Created at: April 17, 2026, 3:38 p.m.