Triple
T22867049
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Francis Greenway |
E567081
|
entity |
| Predicate | legalStatusInNSW |
P150034
|
FINISHED |
| Object | emancipist |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: emancipist | Statement: [Francis Greenway, legalStatusInNSW, emancipist]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: legalStatusInNSW Context triple: [Francis Greenway, legalStatusInNSW, emancipist]
-
A.
legalStatusCanada
Indicates the legal classification or standing of an entity under Canadian law.
-
B.
legalStatusAtIssue
Indicates that the legal status of an entity is the central subject of dispute, consideration, or determination in a legal context.
-
C.
legalStatusAtApproval
Indicates the legal status or classification an entity held at the time it was formally approved.
-
D.
legalStatusClarifiedBy
Indicates that the legal status of something is defined, explained, or resolved by a specific document, decision, or authoritative act.
-
E.
legalStatusAccordingToIndia
Indicates the legal status or classification of an entity as defined specifically by the laws and regulations of India.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e24589083081908d5694c4fdc80086 |
completed | April 17, 2026, 2:36 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f17f0210b481908e0e6c4f95ba5a3b |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:46 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69eed2d507c08190895ed971af0fc755 |
completed | April 27, 2026, 3:07 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69eeeb577e2081909f4a4e9c296535c0 |
completed | April 27, 2026, 4:51 a.m. |
Created at: April 17, 2026, 3:38 p.m.