Triple

T22863101
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Waterford Wedgwood plc E566977 entity
Predicate brand P1500 FINISHED
Object Minton NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Minton | Statement: [Waterford Wedgwood plc, brand, Minton]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Minton
Context triple: [Waterford Wedgwood plc, brand, Minton]
  • A. Minton
    Minton is a surname most notably associated with Sherman Minton, a former U.S. Supreme Court Justice and U.S. Senator.
  • B. Minton chosen
    Minton is a small rural village in Shropshire, England, known for its scenic countryside setting near the Long Mynd hills.
  • C. Peffermill
    Peffermill is a residential area in the south of Edinburgh, Scotland, known for its proximity to Craigmillar and its sports facilities, including the University of Edinburgh’s Peffermill Playing Fields.
  • D. Longy
    Longy was the nickname of Abner "Longy" Zwillman, a prominent American Jewish mobster and bootlegger active during Prohibition and mid-20th-century organized crime.
  • E. Burdine
    Burdine is the respondent in the U.S. Supreme Court employment discrimination case Texas Department of Community Affairs v. Burdine, which clarified the burden of proof framework in Title VII disparate treatment claims.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (2 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e24589083081908d5694c4fdc80086 completed April 17, 2026, 2:36 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f17efdc3b08190be03d856aa86b277 completed April 29, 2026, 3:46 a.m.
Created at: April 17, 2026, 3:38 p.m.