Triple
T22860861
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Moldavia |
E566917
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasCapital |
P204
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Târgu Neamț |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Târgu Neamț | Statement: [Moldavia, hasCapital, Târgu Neamț]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Târgu Neamț Context triple: [Moldavia, hasCapital, Târgu Neamț]
-
A.
Targu Neamț
chosen
Targu Neamț is a town in northeastern Romania known for its medieval Neamț Fortress and its role as a cultural and historical center of the Moldavia region.
-
B.
Târgu Frumos
Târgu Frumos is a small town in northeastern Romania, known as a local commercial and transit center within Iași County in the historical region of Moldavia.
-
C.
Râmnicu Vâlcea
Râmnicu Vâlcea is a city in south-central Romania, located on the Olt River and serving as the capital of Vâlcea County.
-
D.
Miercurea Ciuc
Miercurea Ciuc is a town in eastern Transylvania, Romania, known as a cultural center of the Székely Hungarian community and for its cold climate.
-
E.
Targu Neamt
Targu Neamt is a town in northeastern Romania known for its medieval Neamț Fortress and cultural heritage linked to Romanian history and literature.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e24589083081908d5694c4fdc80086 |
completed | April 17, 2026, 2:36 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f17efcc1308190a95d10e431295ca2 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:46 a.m. |
Created at: April 17, 2026, 3:37 p.m.