Triple
T22859584
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Rewa Kantha |
E566876
|
entity |
| Predicate | includedPrincelyState |
P74995
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Sant State |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Sant State | Statement: [Rewa Kantha, includedPrincelyState, Sant State]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Sant State Context triple: [Rewa Kantha, includedPrincelyState, Sant State]
-
A.
Sant State
chosen
Sant State was a small princely state in colonial India that formed part of the Rewa Kantha Agency under British rule.
-
B.
Mon State
Mon State is a coastal administrative region in southeastern Myanmar known for its ethnically diverse population, including significant Mon and Karen communities, and its historical and cultural importance.
-
C.
Keonthal State
Keonthal State was a small princely state in the Himalayan region of British India, historically associated with the Simla Hill States.
-
D.
Prantij State
Prantij State was a former princely state in western India, located in what is now Sabarkantha district of Gujarat.
-
E.
Wankaner State
Wankaner State was a former princely state in western India, historically governed by rulers from the Jhala Rajput dynasty.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e24589083081908d5694c4fdc80086 |
completed | April 17, 2026, 2:36 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f17ebf1838819092b2b99205a2192f |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:45 a.m. |
Created at: April 17, 2026, 3:37 p.m.