Triple
T22854904
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | The Game of Love |
E566452
|
entity |
| Predicate | producer |
P490
|
FINISHED |
| Object | John Gamble |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: John Gamble | Statement: [The Game of Love, producer, John Gamble]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: John Gamble Context triple: [The Game of Love, producer, John Gamble]
-
A.
John Gamble
chosen
John Gamble is a music producer best known for his work on the R&B group Supernatural’s recordings.
-
B.
John Biddle
John Biddle was a prominent member of the influential Biddle family of Philadelphia, known for their significant role in American finance, politics, and civic life.
-
C.
Joseph Dilworth
Joseph Dilworth was a prominent figure associated with the development or founding of Dilworth, Minnesota, for whom the city was named.
-
D.
John Cruger
John Cruger was a British Loyalist officer who commanded the fortified garrison at Ninety Six, South Carolina, during the American Revolutionary War.
-
E.
Frank W. Gibb
Frank W. Gibb was an American architect known for designing prominent public buildings in Arkansas in the late 19th and early 20th centuries.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e2458750b481908a8e4cf4609cc6cf |
completed | April 17, 2026, 2:36 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f17ebb4ea48190b4b865e316f6a75f |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:44 a.m. |
Created at: April 17, 2026, 3:37 p.m.