Triple

T22842457
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Montonen–Olive duality E566116 entity
Predicate holdsExactlyIn P149931 FINISHED
Object N=4 supersymmetric Yang–Mills in four dimensions (conjecturally) LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: N=4 supersymmetric Yang–Mills in four dimensions (conjecturally) | Statement: [Montonen–Olive duality, holdsExactlyIn, N=4 supersymmetric Yang–Mills in four dimensions (conjecturally)]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: holdsExactlyIn
Context triple: [Montonen–Olive duality, holdsExactlyIn, N=4 supersymmetric Yang–Mills in four dimensions (conjecturally)]
  • A. holdsIn
    Indicates that a relationship, condition, or event is valid or occurs within a specified time interval or temporal context.
  • B. holdsAt
    Indicates that a particular condition or fluent is true and persists at a specified point in time.
  • C. holdsFor
    Indicates that a particular relationship or condition remains true over a specified interval or duration of time.
  • D. holdsTo
    Indicates that one entity maintains, adheres, or remains committed to another entity, such as a belief, standard, agreement, or condition.
  • E. holdsUnder
    Indicates that one entity maintains possession, control, or validity of another entity subject to certain conditions, constraints, or a specific context.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e245869e188190a196584f36e682da completed April 17, 2026, 2:36 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f17e866080819091adfb41cd2a4e13 completed April 29, 2026, 3:44 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69eed2d117088190acbfe130d84f8627 completed April 27, 2026, 3:06 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69eeeb577e2081909f4a4e9c296535c0 completed April 27, 2026, 4:51 a.m.
Created at: April 17, 2026, 3:36 p.m.