Triple
T22834677
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Gmina Tuczępy |
E565910
|
entity |
| Predicate | subdivisionName |
P747
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Gmina Tuczępy |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Gmina Tuczępy | Statement: [Gmina Tuczępy, subdivisionName, Gmina Tuczępy]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Gmina Tuczępy Context triple: [Gmina Tuczępy, subdivisionName, Gmina Tuczępy]
-
A.
Gmina Tuczępy
chosen
Gmina Tuczępy is a rural administrative district in south-central Poland, situated within the Świętokrzyskie Voivodeship.
-
B.
Gmina Tuchów
Gmina Tuchów is an administrative district (gmina) in southern Poland that encompasses the town of Tuchów and surrounding villages.
-
C.
Gmina Pęczniew
Gmina Pęczniew is a rural administrative district in central Poland, located within the Łódź Voivodeship.
-
D.
Gmina Wilczęta
Gmina Wilczęta is a rural administrative district in northern Poland, known for its small villages and forested landscapes within the Warmian-Masurian Voivodeship.
-
E.
Gmina Chęciny
Gmina Chęciny is an administrative district in south-central Poland, centered on the historic town of Chęciny and known for its medieval castle and surrounding natural landscapes.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e24585ab1c81909b2b5065d15805d5 |
completed | April 17, 2026, 2:36 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f17e2e3e7481909d12dc5008136880 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:42 a.m. |
Created at: April 17, 2026, 3:35 p.m.