Triple
T22829096
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Federal Court of Justice |
E565747
|
entity |
| Predicate | legalBasis |
P125
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Courts Constitution Act |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (3 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Courts Constitution Act | Statement: [Federal Court of Justice, legalBasis, Courts Constitution Act]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Courts Constitution Act Context triple: [Federal Court of Justice, legalBasis, Courts Constitution Act]
-
A.
Constitution Act, 1871
The Constitution Act, 1871 is a key statute of the Parliament of the United Kingdom that clarified and expanded Canada’s constitutional framework, particularly regarding the creation and governance of provinces and their institutions.
-
B.
Constitution Act, 1867
The Constitution Act, 1867 is the foundational statute that created the Dominion of Canada and established its federal system of government, dividing powers between the federal and provincial levels.
-
C.
Constitution Act 1986
The Constitution Act 1986 is a key statute that forms the core of New Zealand’s modern constitutional framework, defining the roles and powers of the branches of government and affirming the country’s status as a fully independent state.
-
D.
Constitution Act (British Columbia)
The Constitution Act (British Columbia) is the provincial statute that defines the structure, powers, and functioning of British Columbia’s government and its Legislative Assembly.
-
E.
Constitution Act, 1930
The Constitution Act, 1930 is a Canadian constitutional statute that transferred control of natural resources and public lands to the western provinces, significantly advancing their autonomy within the federation.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Courts Constitution Act Target entity description: The Courts Constitution Act is a key German federal law that defines the structure, jurisdiction, and fundamental principles governing the organization and operation of the courts, including the Federal Court of Justice.
-
A.
Constitution Act, 1871
The Constitution Act, 1871 is a key statute of the Parliament of the United Kingdom that clarified and expanded Canada’s constitutional framework, particularly regarding the creation and governance of provinces and their institutions.
-
B.
Constitution Act, 1867
The Constitution Act, 1867 is the foundational statute that created the Dominion of Canada and established its federal system of government, dividing powers between the federal and provincial levels.
-
C.
Constitution Act 1986
The Constitution Act 1986 is a key statute that forms the core of New Zealand’s modern constitutional framework, defining the roles and powers of the branches of government and affirming the country’s status as a fully independent state.
-
D.
Constitution Act (British Columbia)
The Constitution Act (British Columbia) is the provincial statute that defines the structure, powers, and functioning of British Columbia’s government and its Legislative Assembly.
-
E.
Constitution Act, 1930
The Constitution Act, 1930 is a Canadian constitutional statute that transferred control of natural resources and public lands to the western provinces, significantly advancing their autonomy within the federation.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e24585ab1c81909b2b5065d15805d5 |
completed | April 17, 2026, 2:36 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f17e2a0e308190941064965346f890 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:42 a.m. |
Created at: April 17, 2026, 3:34 p.m.