Triple
T2281980
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Plenary of the Supreme Court |
E51299
|
entity |
| Predicate | typeOfCaseHeard |
P31978
|
FINISHED |
| Object | constitutional cases |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: constitutional cases | Statement: [Plenary of the Supreme Court, typeOfCaseHeard, constitutional cases]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: typeOfCaseHeard Context triple: [Plenary of the Supreme Court, typeOfCaseHeard, constitutional cases]
-
A.
hearsCasesUnder
Indicates that a judicial body or authority has the responsibility and power to adjudicate legal cases falling within a specified jurisdiction, category, or scope.
-
B.
hearsCasesAgainst
Indicates that one party (typically a judicial body or official) formally listens to and considers legal cases brought against another party.
-
C.
typeOfAppeals
Indicates the specific category or kind of appeals associated with or applied to a given case, decision, or legal action.
-
D.
typeOfCasesHandled
chosen
Indicates the categories or kinds of cases that an entity (such as a person, organization, or system) is responsible for managing or processing.
-
E.
legalCase
Indicates a relationship where a formal legal dispute or proceeding exists between parties, typically adjudicated by a court or similar authority.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a88b08e4308190bdac9aebcca1c91a |
completed | March 4, 2026, 7:42 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69abc21c405881908c4df7bee36136fe |
completed | March 7, 2026, 6:13 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69abbdb9aa3c819088d0316c5269a1c2 |
completed | March 7, 2026, 5:55 a.m. |
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:48 p.m.