Triple
T22819394
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | XG-PON |
E565185
|
entity |
| Predicate | supportsQoSMechanisms |
P127932
|
FINISHED |
| Object | true |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [XG-PON, supportsQoSMechanisms, true]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: supportsQoSMechanisms Context triple: [XG-PON, supportsQoSMechanisms, true]
-
A.
supportsQualityOfService
chosen
Indicates that one entity provides or enables quality-of-service guarantees or capabilities for another entity or interaction.
-
B.
supportsBandwidths
Indicates that an entity is compatible with or can operate using the specified range or set of bandwidth values.
-
C.
supportsAudioQuality
Indicates that one entity provides or is compatible with a specified level or type of audio quality for another entity or context.
-
D.
supportsQuality
Indicates that one entity contributes to maintaining, enhancing, or ensuring the quality or standard of another entity or process.
-
E.
supportsQuantization
Indicates that one entity is capable of operating with, or is compatible with, quantized representations or computations of another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e2458426188190b58b8ab4844fe420 |
completed | April 17, 2026, 2:36 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f17dcf39a88190bec26affc304236d |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:41 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69eed2d117088190acbfe130d84f8627 |
completed | April 27, 2026, 3:06 a.m. |
Created at: April 17, 2026, 3:33 p.m.