Triple
T22814836
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | IETF RFC 8826 |
E565070
|
entity |
| Predicate | updates |
P4061
|
FINISHED |
| Object | IETF RFC 8825 |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: IETF RFC 8825 | Statement: [IETF RFC 8826, updates, IETF RFC 8825]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: IETF RFC 8825 Context triple: [IETF RFC 8826, updates, IETF RFC 8825]
-
A.
IETF RFC 8825
chosen
IETF RFC 8825 is a standards document that specifies the overall architecture, signaling, and media handling framework for WebRTC real-time communication over IP networks.
-
B.
IETF RFC 8826
IETF RFC 8826 is a standards document that specifies the security considerations and requirements for real-time communication using WebRTC.
-
C.
RFC 7525
RFC 7525 is an IETF Best Current Practice document that provides recommendations for securely configuring Transport Layer Security (TLS) and Datagram TLS (DTLS) for Internet protocols.
-
D.
RFC 875
RFC 875 is an early Internet standard document that refines and extends the Telnet protocol specifications to improve interoperability and functionality in remote terminal connections.
-
E.
RFC 9205
RFC 9205 is an IETF specification that provides guidance and best practices for the use and deployment of HTTP, complementing the core protocol definitions in related HTTP RFCs.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e2458426188190b58b8ab4844fe420 |
completed | April 17, 2026, 2:36 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f17dcb872881909a031d8560635fce |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:40 a.m. |
Created at: April 17, 2026, 3:33 p.m.