Triple

T22811469
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Best Southwest Partnership E564688 entity
Predicate hasMemberCommunity P2605 FINISHED
Object Lancaster, Texas NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Lancaster, Texas | Statement: [Best Southwest Partnership, hasMemberCommunity, Lancaster, Texas]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Lancaster, Texas
Context triple: [Best Southwest Partnership, hasMemberCommunity, Lancaster, Texas]
  • A. Lancaster, Texas chosen
    Lancaster, Texas is a suburban city in Dallas County that forms part of the Dallas–Fort Worth metropolitan area.
  • B. Lanham, Texas
    Lanham, Texas is a small unincorporated rural community located in Hamilton County in central Texas.
  • C. Lockney, Texas
    Lockney, Texas is a small rural town in the Texas Panhandle known for its agricultural economy and close-knit community.
  • D. New London, Texas
    New London, Texas is a small East Texas town best known as the site of the 1937 New London School explosion, one of the deadliest school disasters in U.S. history.
  • E. Lucas, Texas
    Lucas, Texas is a small suburban city in North Texas known for its rural character, large residential lots, and location within the Dallas–Fort Worth metropolitan area.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (2 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e245823f4c8190ade442cdcc2c224a completed April 17, 2026, 2:36 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f17d60f5948190b624b2dab04cbe63 completed April 29, 2026, 3:39 a.m.
Created at: April 17, 2026, 3:32 p.m.