Triple

T22809738
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Staatsratsvorsitzender E564639 entity
Predicate Legitimation P39443 FINISHED
Object indirekte Wahl LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: indirekte Wahl | Statement: [Staatsratsvorsitzender, Legitimation, indirekte Wahl]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: Legitimation
Context triple: [Staatsratsvorsitzender, Legitimation, indirekte Wahl]
  • A. legitimizedBy
    Indicates that something gains legal, formal, or social validity as a result of the authority, action, or endorsement of another entity.
  • B. helpedLegitimize
    Indicates that one entity’s actions or support contributed to making another entity appear more credible, acceptable, or officially recognized.
  • C. governanceLegitimacy
    Indicates that an authority’s right to govern is recognized as justified, appropriate, and accepted by those subject to its rule.
  • D. legitimacyPerception
    Indicates how legitimate or appropriate an entity, action, or authority is perceived to be by relevant observers or stakeholders.
  • E. authorityLegitimacyBasis chosen
    Indicates the foundational source or justification that makes an authority’s power or right to rule recognized as valid or legitimate.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e245823f4c8190ade442cdcc2c224a completed April 17, 2026, 2:36 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f17d5f1f348190a35e87939732c99f completed April 29, 2026, 3:39 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69eed2cb30f481909566369f515f6eff completed April 27, 2026, 3:06 a.m.
Created at: April 17, 2026, 3:32 p.m.