Triple

T22809403
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Letter XI E564630 entity
Predicate legalArgumentType P149800 FINISHED
Object appeal to rights under the British constitution LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: appeal to rights under the British constitution | Statement: [Letter XI, legalArgumentType, appeal to rights under the British constitution]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: legalArgumentType
Context triple: [Letter XI, legalArgumentType, appeal to rights under the British constitution]
  • A. legalTestType
    Indicates the specific kind or category of legal test or standard that is applied in a given legal context or proceeding.
  • B. legalAuthorityType
    Indicates the specific kind or category of legal authority that governs, authorizes, or regulates an entity or action.
  • C. legalCitationType
    Indicates the specific kind or category of legal citation that characterizes the relationship between the citing and cited legal sources.
  • D. legalCodeType
    Indicates the specific category or classification of a legal code that applies to an entity or situation.
  • E. arguedUnder
    Indicates that one entity presented arguments or conducted a legal case under the supervision, authority, or guidance of another entity (such as a mentor, attorney, or judge).
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e245823f4c8190ade442cdcc2c224a completed April 17, 2026, 2:36 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f17d5f1f348190a35e87939732c99f completed April 29, 2026, 3:39 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69eed2cb30f481909566369f515f6eff completed April 27, 2026, 3:06 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69eeeb5681f88190821129ced752f190 completed April 27, 2026, 4:51 a.m.
Created at: April 17, 2026, 3:32 p.m.