Triple
T22807181
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Hesperia Unified School District |
E564567
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasAdditionalFundingSource |
P69881
|
FINISHED |
| Object | local property taxes |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: local property taxes | Statement: [Hesperia Unified School District, hasAdditionalFundingSource, local property taxes]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasAdditionalFundingSource Context triple: [Hesperia Unified School District, hasAdditionalFundingSource, local property taxes]
-
A.
hasPrimaryFundingSource
Indicates that an entity receives its main or principal financial support from a specified funding source.
-
B.
secondaryFundingSource
chosen
Indicates that an entity has an additional, non-primary source of financial support or funding.
-
C.
additionalFunding
Indicates that one entity provides or allocates extra financial resources beyond an initial or existing amount to another entity or project.
-
D.
possibleAdditionalFunding
Indicates that there is a potential for securing or providing further financial resources beyond what has already been allocated or committed.
-
E.
fundingSourceProposed
Indicates that a particular source of funding has been suggested or put forward to finance an activity, project, or entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e245823f4c8190ade442cdcc2c224a |
completed | April 17, 2026, 2:36 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f17d5d41dc819081912d9e29828bfb |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:39 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69eed2cb30f481909566369f515f6eff |
completed | April 27, 2026, 3:06 a.m. |
Created at: April 17, 2026, 3:32 p.m.