Triple
T22794852
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Paulding County, Georgia |
E564213
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasCity |
P316
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Hiram, Georgia |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Hiram, Georgia | Statement: [Paulding County, Georgia, hasCity, Hiram, Georgia]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Hiram, Georgia Context triple: [Paulding County, Georgia, hasCity, Hiram, Georgia]
-
A.
Hiram, Georgia
chosen
Hiram, Georgia is a small suburban city in Paulding County, northwest of Atlanta, known for its residential communities and local retail centers.
-
B.
Hahira, Georgia
Hahira, Georgia is a small city in southern Georgia known for its annual Honeybee Festival and close-knit community atmosphere.
-
C.
Nahunta, Georgia
Nahunta, Georgia is a small city in southeastern Georgia that serves as the county seat of Brantley County.
-
D.
Sylvania, Georgia
Sylvania, Georgia is a small city in Screven County known as the county seat and a historic community in eastern Georgia.
-
E.
Hartwell, Georgia
Hartwell, Georgia is a small city in northeastern Georgia that serves as a gateway to outdoor recreation and tourism on Lake Hartwell.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e2458185f88190b0045227ee420411 |
completed | April 17, 2026, 2:36 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f17cd81794819091b528600e322d7b |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:36 a.m. |
Created at: April 17, 2026, 3:30 p.m.