Triple
T22794146
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Goiânia |
E564193
|
entity |
| Predicate | governingBody |
P46
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Municipal government of Goiânia |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (3 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Municipal government of Goiânia | Statement: [Goiânia, governingBody, Municipal government of Goiânia]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Municipal government of Goiânia Context triple: [Goiânia, governingBody, Municipal government of Goiânia]
-
A.
Municipal Government of Belo Horizonte
The Municipal Government of Belo Horizonte is the local public administration responsible for managing and providing services, infrastructure, and urban planning for the city of Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
-
B.
Municipal Government of Maceió
The Municipal Government of Maceió is the local public administration responsible for managing city services, urban planning, and municipal policies in the capital of Alagoas, Brazil.
-
C.
Municipal government of Caxias do Sul
The Municipal government of Caxias do Sul is the local public administration responsible for managing services, policies, and development in the city of Caxias do Sul, Brazil.
-
D.
Municipal government of Aracaju
The Municipal government of Aracaju is the local public administration responsible for managing city services, urban planning, and municipal policies in Brazil’s capital of the state of Sergipe.
-
E.
Municipal Chamber of Belo Horizonte
The Municipal Chamber of Belo Horizonte is the city’s legislative council responsible for creating local laws, overseeing the municipal executive, and representing the interests of residents in Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Municipal government of Goiânia Target entity description: The Municipal government of Goiânia is the local public administration responsible for managing the city’s executive and legislative functions, public services, and urban development policies.
-
A.
Municipal Government of Belo Horizonte
The Municipal Government of Belo Horizonte is the local public administration responsible for managing and providing services, infrastructure, and urban planning for the city of Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
-
B.
Municipal Government of Maceió
The Municipal Government of Maceió is the local public administration responsible for managing city services, urban planning, and municipal policies in the capital of Alagoas, Brazil.
-
C.
Municipal government of Caxias do Sul
The Municipal government of Caxias do Sul is the local public administration responsible for managing services, policies, and development in the city of Caxias do Sul, Brazil.
-
D.
Municipal government of Aracaju
The Municipal government of Aracaju is the local public administration responsible for managing city services, urban planning, and municipal policies in Brazil’s capital of the state of Sergipe.
-
E.
Municipal Chamber of Belo Horizonte
The Municipal Chamber of Belo Horizonte is the city’s legislative council responsible for creating local laws, overseeing the municipal executive, and representing the interests of residents in Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e2458185f88190b0045227ee420411 |
completed | April 17, 2026, 2:36 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f17cd81794819091b528600e322d7b |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:36 a.m. |
Created at: April 17, 2026, 3:30 p.m.