Triple
T22790854
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Ellsberg paradox |
E564104
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | concept in decision theory |
C6849
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: concept in decision theory Context triple: [Ellsberg paradox, instanceOf, concept in decision theory]
-
A.
decision theory
chosen
Decision theory is the study of how agents should and do make rational choices under conditions of uncertainty, balancing preferences, probabilities, and outcomes.
-
B.
theory of rational choice under risk
A theory of rational choice under risk explains how individuals should make decisions among uncertain outcomes by systematically comparing the expected utilities of available options, given their probabilities and the decision-maker’s preferences.
-
C.
decision theorist
A decision theorist is someone who studies and develops formal frameworks for making rational choices under uncertainty, weighing probabilities, outcomes, and preferences to guide optimal decision-making.
-
D.
concept in Bayesian statistics
A concept in Bayesian statistics is an abstract idea or construct—such as prior, likelihood, posterior, or credible interval—that helps formalize how beliefs about unknown quantities are updated with observed data using probability.
-
E.
bargaining solution concept
A bargaining solution concept is a formal rule or principle that specifies how two or more parties should divide the benefits of cooperation given their feasible payoffs and disagreement outcomes.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e2455500788190b4b33030461f3bbd |
completed | April 17, 2026, 2:36 p.m. |
Created at: April 17, 2026, 3:29 p.m.