Triple

T22785688
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Jacinta de Jesus Marto E563958 entity
Predicate reportedApparitionsIn P21320 FINISHED
Object 1917 LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 1917 | Statement: [Jacinta de Jesus Marto, reportedApparitionsIn, 1917]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: reportedApparitionsIn
Context triple: [Jacinta de Jesus Marto, reportedApparitionsIn, 1917]
  • A. reportedApparitionEntity chosen
    Indicates that an entity has been reported or described as an apparition in some account or observation.
  • B. apparitionWitnessCount
    Indicates the number of distinct observers who witnessed a particular apparition event.
  • C. reportedFor
    Indicates that one entity has formally notified an authority or system about another entity’s behavior, condition, or status, typically to trigger review or action.
  • D. associatedWithApparition
    Indicates a relationship where something is linked or connected to an apparition, such as being caused by, accompanying, or characterizing that apparition.
  • E. reportedAs
    Indicates that one entity has been formally reported or flagged to another entity, typically as problematic, suspicious, or noteworthy.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e2455500788190b4b33030461f3bbd completed April 17, 2026, 2:36 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f17c30b4dc8190a5e23f4ce7feb300 completed April 29, 2026, 3:34 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69eed2c32e8c8190b73bb9965ed47d64 completed April 27, 2026, 3:06 a.m.
Created at: April 17, 2026, 3:29 p.m.