Triple

T22779578
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Constitution of Brazil of 1891 E563796 entity
Predicate judiciaryEstablished P98442 FINISHED
Object Supreme Federal Court NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (3 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Supreme Federal Court | Statement: [Constitution of Brazil of 1891, judiciaryEstablished, Supreme Federal Court]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Supreme Federal Court
Context triple: [Constitution of Brazil of 1891, judiciaryEstablished, Supreme Federal Court]
  • A. Supreme Federal Court chosen
    The Supreme Federal Court is Brazil’s highest judicial body and constitutional court, responsible for interpreting the Constitution and serving as the final arbiter of legal disputes in the country.
  • B. Supreme Court of the Union
    The Supreme Court of the Union is Myanmar’s highest judicial authority, overseeing the administration of justice and serving as the final court of appeal in the country.
  • C. Supreme Court
    The Supreme Court is the highest judicial authority in Papua New Guinea, serving as the final court of appeal and the ultimate interpreter of the nation’s constitution and laws.
  • D. Supreme Court
    The Supreme Court is the highest judicial authority in Puerto Rico, serving as the final arbiter of legal disputes and interpreter of the territory’s constitution and laws.
  • E. Supreme Court
    The Supreme Court of Norway is the country's highest judicial body, responsible for final appeals and ensuring uniform interpretation of Norwegian law.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: judiciaryEstablished
Context triple: [Constitution of Brazil of 1891, judiciaryEstablished, Supreme Federal Court]
  • A. judiciaryAct
    Indicates that an entity is involved in, established by, or otherwise directly related to a specific judiciary act or piece of judicial legislation.
  • B. judiciaryDefinedAs
    Indicates that one entity is formally specified or characterized as the judiciary (or judicial branch) of another entity.
  • C. hasJudiciary
    Indicates that an entity possesses, is served by, or is under the authority of a judicial body or legal court system.
  • D. judiciaryProvision chosen
    Indicates the legal or constitutional rules, arrangements, or measures that establish, organize, or govern the functioning of the judiciary.
  • E. judiciaryChosenBy
    Indicates that the members of the judiciary are selected or appointed by a specified person, group, or institution.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e24554497c819080b996e071de27c2 completed April 17, 2026, 2:36 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f17b63d348819085668e3d9ac78ffa completed April 29, 2026, 3:30 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69eed2c32e8c8190b73bb9965ed47d64 completed April 27, 2026, 3:06 a.m.
Created at: April 17, 2026, 3:28 p.m.