Triple

T2277915
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Rivonia Trial E51214 entity
Predicate alsoKnownAs P39 FINISHED
Object State v Mandela and Others E51214 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: State v Mandela and Others | Statement: [Rivonia Trial, alsoKnownAs, State v Mandela and Others]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: State v Mandela and Others
Context triple: [Rivonia Trial, alsoKnownAs, State v Mandela and Others]
  • A. Rivonia Trial chosen
    The Rivonia Trial was a landmark 1963–1964 South African court case in which Nelson Mandela and other anti-apartheid leaders were prosecuted and ultimately sentenced to long prison terms for sabotage and related charges, drawing global attention to the struggle against apartheid.
  • B. R (Jackson) v Attorney General
    R (Jackson) v Attorney General is a landmark 2005 House of Lords case that examined the constitutional validity of legislation enacted under the Parliament Acts and explored fundamental principles about the limits of parliamentary sovereignty and the rule of law in the UK.
  • C. Supreme Court of Appeal of South Africa
    The Supreme Court of Appeal of South Africa is the country’s highest court for non-constitutional matters, serving as an appellate court that reviews decisions from lower courts.
  • D. Strickland v. Washington
    Strickland v. Washington is a landmark 1984 U.S. Supreme Court case that established the two-pronged test for determining when a criminal defendant’s right to effective assistance of counsel has been violated.
  • E. Maryland v. Wirtz
    Maryland v. Wirtz was a 1968 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the extension of federal minimum wage and overtime provisions to employees of state-operated schools and hospitals under the Fair Labor Standards Act.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a88b08e4308190bdac9aebcca1c91a completed March 4, 2026, 7:42 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69abc217b6648190be77d2176d322efd completed March 7, 2026, 6:13 a.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69ae71e2a17081908539717619ad7187 completed March 9, 2026, 7:08 a.m.
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:48 p.m.