Triple

T22765897
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Æthelflæd of Damerham E563122 entity
Predicate marriageOrderToEdmund I P149640 FINISHED
Object second wife LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: second wife | Statement: [Æthelflæd of Damerham, marriageOrderToEdmund I, second wife]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: marriageOrderToEdmund I
Context triple: [Æthelflæd of Damerham, marriageOrderToEdmund I, second wife]
  • A. relationshipWithEdmund
    Indicates that there exists some form of relationship or connection involving the entity Edmund.
  • B. marriageToEdwardIV
    Indicates a marital relationship in which the subject is (or was) married to Edward IV.
  • C. marriageOrderRelativeToNoelEdmonds
    Indicates the relative chronological position of a marriage event in comparison to Noel Edmonds’ marriage timeline.
  • D. marriageOrderWithCatherineParr
    Indicates the sequence or relative ordering of marriages involving Catherine Parr in relation to another spouse or marriage event.
  • E. marriageToEdwardTheConfessor
    Indicates a marital relationship in which the subject is married to Edward the Confessor.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e24552e11c81909c2d61578a558bd7 completed April 17, 2026, 2:36 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f17a80249c819091569e7b8d500b45 completed April 29, 2026, 3:26 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69eed2b88d88819096015deb6a648801 completed April 27, 2026, 3:06 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69eeeb5681f88190821129ced752f190 completed April 27, 2026, 4:51 a.m.
Created at: April 17, 2026, 3:26 p.m.