Triple
T22742111
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | 1979 NHL–WHA merger |
E562439
|
entity |
| Predicate | includedDraftConcessions |
P148943
|
FINISHED |
| Object | true |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [1979 NHL–WHA merger, includedDraftConcessions, true]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: includedDraftConcessions Context triple: [1979 NHL–WHA merger, includedDraftConcessions, true]
-
A.
demandedConcessionTo
Indicates that one party insisted another party grant a concession, typically as a condition or requirement in a negotiation or conflict.
-
B.
concessionBy
Indicates that one party grants, yields, or makes allowances to another, often accepting a demand, point, or condition despite initial opposition or differing interests.
-
C.
concessionIncludes
chosen
Indicates that one concession contains, comprises, or encompasses another concession as a part or subset.
-
D.
concernsFormerConcessionsOf
Indicates that something (such as a statement, document, or discussion) is about or relates to concessions that were previously granted or held by a particular entity.
-
E.
concessionFor
Indicates a relationship where one party grants or yields something—such as rights, privileges, or resources—to another, often as part of a negotiation or agreement.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e245513a5c81908d5cb471b4fc429d |
completed | April 17, 2026, 2:36 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f1797400fc8190bec26726f434f787 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:22 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69eed2a971c0819088af574e40c9343f |
completed | April 27, 2026, 3:06 a.m. |
Created at: April 17, 2026, 3:23 p.m.